BOSTON – Nov. 10, 2026 – PRLog — My name is Daryl Guberman. I am a 40-year quality expert and Boeing shareholder, 203-556-1493. I have hit 651,000 views on TikTok discussing implants. And I am here to tell you, in plain words, what may be in your body may not be the same as what is on your implant identification card, or your UDI — your Unique Device Identification. The UDI-DI is the model. The UDI-PI is the lot, the serial number, the manufacture date. If the chain behind that card is broken, that card cannot prove what is inside you.
This is the GUBERMAN CHAIN OF CUSTODY: SYSTEMIC FAILURE, revealed to international audiences, affecting every industry. Not one industry. Every industry. Aerospace. Medical. Plastics. Metallurgical. Food. All of it WORLDWIDE.
IT STARTED IN MARCH 2014 — CERTIFIED ONCE, ACCEPTED EVERYWHERE
It started in March 2014. I received an email from the Vice President of ANAB and the Chairman of the IAF. He said the international accreditation bodies under the MRA and the MLA are equivalent in accreditation to ANAB. Certified once, accepted everywhere.
MRA is Mutual Recognition Arrangement. MLA is Multilateral Recognition Arrangement. Certified once, accepted everywhere is the mantra for the international accreditation bodies equivalent to ANAB. And ANAB’s mantra in the United States is, we only certify the system, not the product.
So if the system is broken in America, it is broken everywhere. If the certificate is invalid in America, it is INVALID worldwide. That is how the fraud travels.
CERTIFIED ONCE- TRUSTED NEVER: THE GLOBAL ACCREDITATION LIE https://youtu.be/
SEPTEMBER 4, 2018 — THE WORD NOBODY WAS TOLD
On Department of State contract 19AQMM18R0131, September 4, 2018, ANAB was named as underwriter for the International Accreditation Forum. Someone, or somebody, in the hierarchy of ANSI-ANAB gave the Department of State that term, underwriter.
This person, or body, within ANSI-ANAB never told their employees of ANSI-ANAB. Never told the international accreditation equivalent bodies. Never told the registrars. Never told the auditors. Never told the business owners. Never told the insurers. Never told the investors. Never told the doctors. Never told the patient. Nobody down the chain knew.
ISO/IEC 17011 — Conformity Assessment, Requirements for Accreditation Bodies Accrediting Conformity Assessment Bodies — says an accreditation body must be impartial. An underwriter takes the failure. You cannot be the judge and the backer. That breaks impartiality. That is the fraud ANAB perpetrated.
THE DOJ CONTRACT — THEY FURTHERED IT, THEY NEVER FIXED IT
And then the Department of Justice did it again. DOJ contract 15F06725C0000139, from 2024. ANAB is on it, but ANAB is not called out as underwriter on it. They never cured it. They never corrected it. They never retracted the September 4, 2018 designation. The DOJ, the DOC, and the DOS bought in during 2024, after the fraud, and never fixed it.
There is no statute of limitations when it comes to a concealed fraud. They never corrected it. ANAB never retracted it. The clock does not save them.
Federal Contract Records Reveal ANAB’s 14 Year Accreditation Identity Breakdown: DOS 19AQMM18R0131 (2018) and DOJ 15F06725C0000139 (2025) https://www.prlog.org/
YOU CANNOT SEE STERILE — 21 CFR 820.75
The number is 21 CFR 820.75. Process Validation. The FDA wrote it plain: where the results of a process cannot be fully verified by subsequent inspection and test, the process shall be validated with a high degree of assurance and approved according to established procedures. That is the law.
What does that mean in plain words? You cannot see germs. You cannot look at an implant, or a scope, or a sealed tray, and tell me it is sterile. You cannot test the exact one that goes inside you, because the test would destroy it. Sterility testing is sample testing, lot testing — never the exact unit. So the FDA does not ask the manufacturer to test it after. The FDA asks the manufacturer to validate the process before — to prove, with objective evidence, with dates, with signatures, with equipment, with qualified people, that the process consistently produces a sterile product, every time, and to revalidate it when anything changes.
And the reliability factor the FDA expects is called SAL — Sterility Assurance Level — 10 to the minus 6. One in one million. No more than one chance in one million that a device that touches sterile tissue or the bloodstream remains non-sterile after sterilization. That is the standard for an implant. That is the standard for a hip, a knee, a heart valve, a spinal screw. One in one million.
THOSE ENDOSCOPES NEVER GET PROPERLY CLEANED
About 1 in 5 reprocessed gastrointestinal endoscopes are still contaminated when they are called patient-ready, even after following the manufacturer’s cleaning instructions. Colonoscopes are the worst — bacteria were found in nearly 1 out of every 3 devices, about 32% testing positive after reprocessing. Upper endoscopy scopes run about 1 in 4, duodenoscopes about 1 in 7, with a pooled contamination rate of 15.25% for reprocessed patient-ready duodenoscopes. The dangerous ones — high-concern organisms like E. coli, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, and drug-resistant CRE — were found on 4.1% to 5.3% of reprocessed duodenoscopes. The CDC has said more healthcare-associated infection outbreaks have been linked to contaminated medical scopes than to any other medical device.
Why? Because a scope is not sterilized to SAL 10 to the minus 6. A scope is high-level disinfected. Disinfected is not sterilized. High-level disinfection kills most germs, but it is not validated to one in one million. It is a cleaning, not a sterilization. And the scope has long, narrow channels, small diameters, an elevator mechanism that traps tissue and blood, and you cannot see inside it. You cannot inspect it clean. You cannot prove it clean. You can only trust the paper that says it was reprocessed — and the paper is the same paper that said ANAB was an underwriter on Department of State contract 19AQMM18R0131, September 4, 2018, and never corrected it.
A dirty scope does not always make the patient sick, but when it does, it is serious. Johns Hopkins, in the journal Gut in 2018, found 1.1 infections per 1,000 screening colonoscopies within 7 days, 1.6 per 1,000 for non-screening colonoscopies, and 3.0 per 1,000 for upper GI endoscopy. That is about 1 patient in 1,000 — but the rate varied enormously by facility, from 0 to 115 per 1,000 for screening colonoscopy. Between 2013 and 2024, contaminated Olympus duodenoscopes were connected to infections in hundreds of patients across the United States, with at least 35 deaths attributed to drug-resistant bacteria.
So here is the question I want you to ask your doctor, in writing, before they put anything inside you. Was this device sterilized to SAL 10 to the minus 6, under 21 CFR 820.75, or was it only high-level disinfected?
Because you cannot see sterile. And after September 4, 2018, you cannot trust the paper that says it is.
THE CONFESSIONS:
I am going to give you three confessions. Three confessions, from three different people, in three different places, that all say the same thing. The quality system is broken. The degradation of quality. The dilapidation of quality. And nobody fixed it.
Confession number one — Pamela Sale, Vice President of Laboratory Accreditation for Forensics, ANAB, 2017. She confessed, under oath, in her own words, verbatim: “There is no commonly agreed-upon set of standards that forensics labs around the country have to follow. Instead, there are informal guidelines that labs can choose to follow or not.”
And ISO/IEC 17025 is not just for forensics. ISO/IEC 17025 is utilized also for metallurgical testing, and also for plastic testing. So when she confessed that the labs were out of control, she was confessing for every laboratory in the world. Out of control means you can’t tell with certainty what the materials are that are being tested. https://www.austinmonitor.com/
Confession number two — Elizabeth Lund, Vice President of Quality for the Boeing Company, June 27, 2024, Reuters interview. She said Boeing was willing and prepared to get an AS9100. She said they were compliant to the standard. She said they were doing internal audits as if they were certified. If AS9100 wasn’t important, why would she even make the comment about it? BOEING is not certified. BOEING has never been certified even as far back as July 2002 -24 years. BOEING as far as Daryl Guberman’s October 2024 visit goes, internal audits appeared to be never performed.
I went out there in October 2024, to Everett, Renton, Auburn, Northfield, Washington State, for almost a month, to confirm what she said. And everybody I spoke with said they didn’t know anything about AS9100. They didn’t know anything about auditing. And when they were asked to go to a safety meeting, their boss would tell them no, because the plane has to move to the next station. https://finance.yahoo.com/
Confession number three — the business owner who says, “I don’t care about the certificate. I make good parts.” Let me tell you something, business owner. Your parts ride on the certificate. Your parts ride on the paper. You do not make good parts in a vacuum. You make parts in a system. And if the system is broken, your parts are broken. If the chain is broken, your parts are broken. You say you make good parts? Prove it. Show me the paper. Show me the chain of custody, from the raw material, to the test, to the laboratory, to the certificate, to the part in your hand. You can’t prove it. Because on Department of State contract 19AQMM18R0131, September 4, 2018, ANAB was named as underwriter, and they never told you. So your certificate is invalid. Your environment is invalid. Compromised. Fraudulent. From September 4, 2018 to this very day, because they never corrected it.
THE SAME SYSTEM — CHINA, AND THE LAB
In 2015, Xiao Jianhua was made the chairman of the International Accreditation Forum — the IAF. He held that chair from 2015 to 2021. He was also the chief executive of the China National Accreditation Service — CNAS — in Beijing. In January 2017, CNAS certified the ill-prepared Wuhan Institute of Virology BSL-4 laboratory. Six-months prior to receiving certification, Scientists said they did not have enough highly trained technicians. They are the first line of containment in any BSL-4 laboratory. Several months after certification American specialists visit the lab and scientists were still complaining about not having enough highly trained technicians.
In 2018, Diplomats Warned Of Risky Coronavirus Experiments In A Wuhan Lab. No One Listened https://www.politico.com/
CDC-Center for Disease Control & Prevention
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES
VOLUME 25 NUMBER 5 MAY 2019
Biosafety Level 4 Laboratory User Training Program China https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/
In 2017, Communist China passed its National Intelligence Law, Article 7: all organizations and citizens shall support, assist, and cooperate with national intelligence efforts in accordance with law.
I wrote to BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard, and Fidelity on March 19, 2026. Only State Street got back to me. On April 15, 2026, at 6:20 in the morning, State Street said: Mr. Guberman, we’ve opened up a case on your behalf.
FAA AND FDA — SIDE BY SIDE
FAA: 14 CFR 21.137, quality system. AC 21-29D, Detecting and Reporting Suspected Unapproved Parts. FAA Order 8120.16, the SUP Program. If the paper is missing, if the chain is broken, you quarantine the part. You do not install it. You file FAA Form 8120-11.
FDA: 21 CFR Part 820, the Quality Management System Regulation, effective February 2, 2026, incorporating ISO 13485:2016. Identification. Traceability. Nonconforming product. Corrective and preventive action. 21 CFR Part 821, medical device tracking. 21 CFR Part 830, Unique Device Identification. If the paper is missing, if the chain is broken, the device is nonconforming. You segregate it. You report it under 21 CFR Part 803, in 30 days. You do not implant it.
One part of the chain is broken, the certification for the system is broken, then the entire product should not be put in the body. That is the FDA rule. That is the FAA rule. Same rule. Same failure.
That is the GUBERMAN chain of custody: systemic failure. Not a defect. A systemic failure. From the miner, to the refiner, to the lab, to the machinist, to the sterilizer, to the sealed package, to the scope, to the patient — one broken link, and the whole chain is broken.
Get the manufacturer. Get the manufacturing date, not the surgery date. Get the paper in writing. And call me. Daryl Guberman 201-556 1493.
DHS SUBCOMMITTEE PHOTO — APRIL 17, 2024
Under penalty of ejection or arrest I stood up: https://www.newstribune.com/
REFERENCES: EXPOSES ANSI-ANAB & BOEING
GOVLY Signal #163758: https://app.govly.com/
SamSearch — Federal Agencies Face Oversight Failures in Accreditation Processes: https://samsearch.co/
Boeing International Film: The Shields Of Death — Exposing Decades Of Uncertified Corruption, premiered September 16, 2025: https://youtu.be/
DARYL GUBERMAN 203 556 1493
***@yahoo.com
203 556 1493
Photos:
https://www.prlog.org/
https://www.prlog.org/
https://www.prlog.org/